KUDLOW'S MONEY POLITIC$
PRO-GROWTH, STRONG DEFENSE, VIRTUOUS VALUES, BUSINESS, AND STOCKS

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2007

Kudlow 101: Milton Friedman Rides Again

There are fresh signs that we are on the verge of a major inflationary plunge.

We recently took a closer look at the relationship between M1 and inflation. Here’s what we found. Since the early 1990s this relationship has improved dramatically. And over the last six years or so, this correlation has remained strong. This surprised me. I had not looked at this in a long time. There is a clear link to prices and a plunging future inflation rate. This is classic Friedman monetarism.

Take a look at this picture of the CPI inflation rate:

Contrary to the recent flare-up of inflation last week, we are actually going to get a somewhat lower inflation rate this year of around 2.7 percent. Inflation was running at 3.2 percent in 2006 and 3.4 percent in 2005. So even though we had a bad number in November, calendar year-to-date, it’s actually lower than the prior two years.

Now let’s take a look at the M1 money supply. M1 is simply currency in circulation plus other checkable deposits. Milton Friedman used this. And it also happens to be part of the reason why inflation is coming down.


In the beginning of this decade, M1 was rising rather rapidly. It came in at 3.3 percent back in 2001, rose again the following year, and eventually peaked at 6.5 percent in 2003. But it has been coming down ever since. In fact, M1 came in at 2.0 percent in 2005, 0.2 percent in 2006, and calendar year-to-date, it’s actually in negative territory at minus 0.3 percent.

Money is the ultimate cause of inflation. Inflation is everywhere a monetary phenomenon. Therefore, since M1 growth has essentially collapsed, we are now looking at a big drop in CPI inflation.

Take a close look at this chart. With a two-year time lag, we’re looking at a roughly 1.5 percent inflation rate. Maybe even less.


As University of Michigan economist and Carpe Diem blogger Mark Perry told me, this relationship is not a direct, one-to-one relationship. In other words, there is about a 2 or 3-year lag, since money growth takes this amount of time before it has its final impact on prices.

There is no perfect, silver-bullet, forecasting device for inflation. And while this monetarist model revived by Mark Perry is interesting and statistically significant, no one can say for sure that this is the ultimate method of predicting inflation. That said, money still looks tight from the standpoint of an inverted yield curve and a near zero growth of the monetary base.

If these views are correct, now is the time to sell gold and buy the dollar.

Tomorrow we’ll take a look at the velocity (or turnover rate) of money and compare that to gold in the context of this monetary approach. Monetarist models of inflation have had their ups and downs over last 30 years, but so have commodity models of inflation. The trick is to use some common sense to evaluate the whole story.

But the key point here is that inflation looks like it’s going to plunge.

The Problem with many Rural Think Tanks, Blogs, and University Studies!

I thought I should point out a caution about some things that are listed on my BLOG.

I have a lot of blogs, university papers, and rural “think tanks” listed on my web page. In fact, I intend to add more when I have time. It is not an endorsement of all the thoughts and ideas, but rather a compilation of places I look at for information.

The problem with a lot of the rural advocacy groups is their reliance on state or federal government for their hope and direction. Many get their paychecks from the numerous state and federal legislative bills, so understand the perspective.

Yet, I find the best direction always comes from the ideas and actions of people that live in the community. It requires leadership, listening, and planning all of which do not have to cost much.

Government is in most cases the real barrier to success in small town America. Politicians are picking winners and losers through various incentives and tax schemes…..not letting the real market work. It means you have to try and work within the dysfunctional system, but hopefully pushing for real change at the levels of government inhibiting real innovation and change.

So as you visit the links and blogs realize you the run the gamete on ideas from left to right. However, I am confident you will find the information informative and useful.

Minnesota and the New Ruralism: Planning in Rurality

A good power point specific to Minnesota with demographics. I am quite confident there is a lot of material that is similar to any small city around this great country of ours.

This is further evidence of how a new way of thinking is required because a lot has changed in non-metro areas including: population, economics, services, and expectations.

By Benjamin Winchester
University of Minnesota Morris
Coordinator, Data Analysis & Research
September 30, 2004

www.morris.umn.edu/services/cst/pubs/MN_New_Ruralism_MNAPA_2004.ppt

Have a Happy & Safe New Year!!!!!!!!

The Mayor

Who Will Not Win the Republican Nomination!!!

The Republican side is much more complicated because of the confusion and contentious relationships that have emerged in a humbled Republican Party.

The Fiscal Conservatives have started calling Social Conservatives names relating to intolerance. The Social Conservatives continue to splinter among many different candidates, and have not united behind a single candidate as in past elections. The National Security wing of the party is just catching their breath and emerging from behind the rocks after seeing the surge start to work in Iraq. Yet I do think Republicans can win the Presidency.

The polls show anyone in the Republican Party can win right now. However if the Republican Party will stay intact a few candidates will not win.

Rather than predicting a winner at this point I will predict two losers with a few more predictions to follow:

Giuliani will not win the Republican Nomination. He needs social conservatives to win a general election, and even though Pat Robertson endorsed him he will lose. His strategy of not planning to win in the primary season until Florida is a dumb a strategy. He should have at minimum built the foundation in the early primaries that he did not have to win just place a strong third or SOMETHING in a state like New Hampshire. McCain will emerge as the alternative to Giuliani in Florida and states like it.

Dead Fred will also not win the Nomination. I hate to say it but the best part of his run for President was when he was not in the race. I think he is the truest conservative from his voting record in the Senate, but his campaign has been less than inspiring or "Reganesque.

Hillary will win the Nomination!!!

I think if you look at the numbers (Realclearpolitics.com) Hillary remains in good shape for the Democratic Nomination. National polls show it is not close at this point among Democrats. The polls have not moved even though people are now paying closer attention nationally.

Even in Iowa and New Hampshire we are starting to see that Obama may have peaked to soon. The statistics don't look good at this point for the junior Senator from Illinois even though the media seems to be pumping a horse race. (Purely for the ratings and who can blame them!!)

For Obama to stay alive he needs to run the table on the first three contests to have a true shot at the Democratic nomination. I think in the current environment that will be impossible for the Senator, and he will be the future Vice-Presidential Nominee on the Democratic Ticket.

The Service Industry, Technology, Rural Minnesota, JOBZ, and the need for Innovation

This letter is a result of being the Mayor of Clarissa, and dealing with all levels of government from the state level right down to our locally elected officials. More over, it is a result of speaking with people down at MN DEED (Department of Employment and Economic Development) recently regarding infrastructure grants and policy problems that currently exist.

My inquiry started in regards to developing industrial parks in Northern Todd County. It is important that our area be competitive in the JOBZ program currently offered by the State of Minnesota. JOBZ I have felt is an initial attempt to strengthen rural Minnesota and the manufacturing sector at large.

However, I now believe JOBZ needs some major modifications. I believe this is vital to the health of metro and rural areas of Minnesota.

There have been a number of small industries that have shut their doors recently in Todd and Wadena County. In Clarissa we dodged a major blow to our local economy as we were able to bring in a new manufacturing business soon after the loss of the current occupant to Michigan.

A personal example:

Right now cities in our area all have industrial parks that were designated JOBZ, however, many remain undeveloped without the proper utilities and infrastructure to support such a business. (Just to give you an idea Clarissa currently rents out our industrial park to a farmer who plants corn on it so we can control the weeds during the summer.)

When speaking with DEED they informed me they will not give a city like Clarissa a 50/50 matching grant to develop an industrial park unless you have an “iron clad” commitment from a business to locate there. My point with DEED and many of our state leaders is a business (correctly) won’t locate to an industrial park that does not have the proper infrastructure and utilities.

The result is small communities do not have the tax-base to install such infrastructure. Hence we lose out to the larger cities that have the capacity to make that initial investment. In addition the large cities are getting to use the JOBZ benefits (taxpayer dollars) that were never intended to be granted initially. What was intended as a help to out state Minnesota has now in some instances made it harder for rural Minnesota to complete.

There needs to be some common ground in this area to assist small cities in developing the capacity to attract industrial businesses. It is vital to the strength of rural Minnesota, but also helps the larger cities by reducing the stress of over development. Problems such as: traffic congestion, pollution, affordable housing, etc.

Statistics do show that moderate growth in this area is coming over the next quarter century. It is good news for an area like ours, but with the changes in our economy away from agriculture and manufacturing a new way of thinking and planning for the future is required. I hope to offer a few ideas and solutions.

Ideas for advancing Minnesota:

· I think it is long over due to have some serious summits throughout the state that bring all levels of government together to hear ideas and solutions on a non-partisan basis. Minnesotans I talk with are tired of political affiliation and would like some honest dialogue.

· JOBZ needs to be reformed or dismantled. The current system has benefits and the need to support and aid our economy as it restructures is important. However, the situation as it stands now puts rural Minnesota at a distinct disadvantage. There needs to be some tiered levels in JOBZ that addresses big cities down to rural cities.

· Technology and the Service industry need to be supported and promoted. With the introduction of the Internet and technology a statewide comprehensive plan needs to be adopted and implemented. Rural communities can have a much diversified economy if technology infrastructure is implemented smartly and correctly.

• We need to expand our view beyond manufacturing to include the entire service industry. It represents 80% of private employment and economic output. We need to make sure we are addressing the needs of an industry rather than picking and choosing specific sectors.

· Realize that free markets work and government is largely inefficient. Government needs to promote growth and innovation. It can do this best by reducing barriers that inhibit growth.

· Supporting and transforming education. We need to get workers that are displaced from the old economy plugged into the new economy. This means our K-12, technical schools, and colleges need to continue to make sure course offerings match the jobs of the 21st century. We need classes that incentivize students to excel in areas of math and science.

(I would rather see a student paid to go to advanced math and science classes rather than the mundane jobs offered in many work study programs that any person is capable of doing.)

If the planning and implementation is done correctly it means greater opportunity for everyone. I also believe with the advances in technology it means a rural city like Clarissa can attract high paying technology and service industry jobs by offering a quality of life metro cities cannot.

To be competitive, however, we have to have broad partnerships across party lines, city and county boundaries, and personal biases. We also have to provide the right infrastructure and business environment. If the leadership from the state, county, and local officials cannot rise to the occasion it means business will pass us by and head to places that are.

American Ambassadors: Winning hearts and minds with Freedom!

My wife, Belene, spent most of her formative years growing up in the mountains of the Philippines. She often talks fondly of trips down to the American military bases where she was able to get a taste of American life and a reminder of home.

One memorable trip resulted in a hat from a Marine. It is in many pictures and was an obvious sign of pride and patriotism. The American Armed Forces in its WWII structure were real influences in the areas they were based. Not only because of the military protection they offered, but more importantly by the reaching out of soldiers to the children, families, and communities around them. They were true ambassadors who often showed, in a real way, what makes our country great.

With a smaller and restructured military we have seen the American footprint change, and some of the unintended consequences appear to be a loss of true Ambassadors in many areas around the world.

President George W. Bush will (hopefully) be judged honestly by historians once he leaves office in just over a year. I have always held the belief that President Bush will be judged, and correctly so, that he got the big view of radical Islam correct and its threat to our way of life.

Even though “war is hell” and does not always go as smoothly as we would like. The big picture when you are the President is what counts.

Those against this war would try to call me a “Neo-con” for this belief, though I would disagree. (POINT OF MENTION: Hats off to the “Liberals” for finally coming up with a derogatory word that seems to stick to conservatives in a negative way. It has taken them since Dukakis to do it, but they have finally done it. Congrats!!)

Anyways……….

This past August my son and I were able to visit the peaceful (Sunni Muslim) country of Senegal. The nation of Senegal boasts a ninety-seven percent population of Islamic believers. As we traveled the countryside we were inundated with people who wanted to speak to Americans and get our view of what is going on in the world.

As we talked to many different people during our travels I started to understand that even in Islamic countries there is tremendous fear of the more radical forms of Islam that are spreading across Northern Africa. Senegalese people made it very clear that they considered themselves friends of Americans, and want us to be involved in countering the movements in their country toward radical Islam.

One official we met even introduced us to the largest land tortoise named “Bill Clinton” just to show us just how pro-American they really are.

While we drove around we noticed a tremendous amount of construction going up along the coastline of the Atlantic Ocean. My inquiry got me a long lecture on how Senegal is preparing for a world-wide Islamic conference next year. The government is building tremendous hotels and accommodations for leaders from all over the Islamic world including the more radical elements.

There was pride and fear evident as the discussions continued. There has been pressure on the government here to require teaching of the Koran in all schools, and some forms of more radical laws being passed. All of this to gain the favor of the Islamic leaders soon so to be arriving.

We were then able to visit some mosques and libraries that were built by Moammar Gaddafi, the Libyan dictator. The Libyan leader is in legacy building mode right now. He is building major mosques, libraries, and infrastructure throughout North Africa.

Other of the more radical Islamic governments are also following suit because money certainly has influence on power.

It all made me understand how important American influence overseas is even in the “insignificant” countries. I quickly realized how my son and I were ambassadors, and the only American many people will ever talk too or get to know.

I was disappointed at the lack of real American Ambassadorship in Senegal. It seems on some fronts we are losing ground. Even worse we may be losing the hearts and minds of many in these countries to a more radical element. Radical Islam has no problem pouring vast amounts of influence and money into these vulnerable areas of the world. America does need to restructure the State Department to coincide with the new military structure of the 21st Century.

The world of Republican politics is stranger than ever.

Pat Robertson backs Giuliani
Associated Press
Last update: November 07, 2007 – 11:47 AM

WASHINGTON — Televangelist Pat Robertson, founder of the Christian Coalition, endorsed Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday.

"It is my pleasure to announce my support for America's Mayor, Rudy Giuliani, a proven leader who is not afraid of what lies ahead and who will cast a hopeful vision for all Americans," Robertson said during a news conference with Giuliani in Washington.

The former New York mayor backs abortion rights and gay rights, positions that put him in conflict with conservative GOP orthodoxy, and has been trying to persuade evangelical conservatives like Robertson to overlook their differences on those issues.

Evangelicals have split in their support for the leading Republican candidates. Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback, a favorite of Christian conservatives who dropped out of the race last month, endorsed fellow Sen. John McCain of Arizona on Wednesday. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney recently announced that Paul Weyrich and Bob Jones III were on board with his candidacy.

Asked about the Robertson endorsement, McCain, at a news conference with Brownback in Dubuque, Iowa, said: "Every once in a while, I'm left speechless. This is one of those times."

Giuliani is best known to voters for leading New York in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Shortly after 9/11, Robertson released a statement in which he said the attacks occurred because Americans had insulted God and lost the protection of heaven by allowing abortion and "rampant Internet pornography."

Robertson made no mention of his differences with Giuliani on social issues in Wednesday's statement.

"Rudy Giuliani took a city that was in decline and considered ungovernable and reduced its violent crime, revitalized its core, dramatically lowered its taxes, cut through a welter of bureaucratic regulations, and did so in the spirit of bipartisanship which is so urgently needed in Washington today," Robertson said.

Robertson, who unsuccessfully ran for president in 1988, founded the Christian Broadcasting Network, the Christian Coalition and Regent University in Virginia Beach.

Also Wednesday, Giuliani said he asked two GOP friends in Congress, Reps. Peter King of New York and Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas, to introduce bills to keep states from giving licenses or similar identification to illegal immigrants.

The Democratic front-runner, Hillary Clinton, was criticized after a televised debate last week when she hedged an answer on whether she supported New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's effort to grant licenses to illegal immigrants. Her aides say she generally supports the idea in the absence of comprehensive immigration reform.

More Explanation about the Building Inspection Process

I got raked over the coals in a "Letter to the Editor". I'll try and post that, but here was my response the following week. Actually once she came to our council meeting and everything was laid out we all came to some common understandings and it was a very productive meeting.

At our two last two council meetings there have been discussions about the new inspection process. I would like to take time to explain the reasoning behind the decisions we have made up to this point.

I have talked with many citizens who have stated their happiness and /or concerns alike. I appreciate all of your input. This is a new and exciting process for the City. I also understand that change can bring some difficulty and confusion.

The decision to implement the new process has caught some by surprise. We have tried our best to inform people what was going to happen throughout this nine month process. We have learned that we have done some things well. Looking back on hindsight, we could have done some things differently. I hope that people will have a better understanding of what is happening and why after reading this article.

Please feel free to contact me or join us at a council meeting to discuss your concerns or ideas.

Sonja V (Letter to the Editor 10/03/2007) was present at our last council meeting. The meeting covered the inspection process and we all discussed issues raised in her letter. We were able to come to some common understanding and were able to draw constructive ideas and suggestions.
I appreciated her taking time to write the letter and attend our meeting.

The city has gone through an extended period of planning over the last two years, and has developed our Comprehensive Plan. Citizens participated and gave their input on what our strengths and weaknesses are as a city. Our comprehensive plan was developed based on the input we received from you. We approved that plan earlier this year after months of meetings. I would encourage you all to view this document either at the INH Website or by stopping by Clarissa City Hall.

The number one issue that was highlighted was the condition of the physical appearance of existing buildings and infrastructure. These related to rental properties, our downtown businesses, Hwy 71 and various sections of town. I think a majority of you would agree Clarissa needs to address these issues if it wants to attract new businesses and families that call it home.

A plan was needed to address this issue. The plan we came up with was the inspection process. The council and I are aware that we are entering unpopular territory when we implement a process that tells someone they need to make changes to their property. It is imperative we start here because it is a foundational issue and is closely related to other issues vital to development in Clarissa. We continue to remain open to your suggestions on how we can improve this process.

After consulting with other cities that have a process in place, we decided to bring in NCIS for a few reasons:

1. We wanted the process to cover the entire city using the city ordinances we have. Using our ordinance and applying it city wide would give a sense of fairness to all. In other words, it would not be viewed as picking on any one individual or group. It is difficult to tackle issues of this kind in a close-knit community like ours without the impression that we are personally targeting individuals. We wanted the Mayor to be subjected to the same inspection that any citizen would be going through. (PS: The mayor got a letter as well regarding his trim needing painting.)

2. NCIS was also chosen because they are familiar with this area and have worked in cities like Motley and Staples. The process is one many cities have in place that is consistent and fair across the board. It ensures that any citizen can have their complaint heard and handled fairly by professionals in the industry.

There has been some comment about why the use of a strict date and certain wording in the letter. We have in the past sent out our own letters. I have talked personally to various owners about problems big and small to find solutions. What we have experienced is that there is often no follow-through and no progress. The letters used by NCIS have dates and language required by law, so that the council can then move forward on issues it feels are most important to address.

We also understand that projects take money, time, and ability that may be lacking in the time frame laid out by NCIS. What we have asked is that those receiving the letter that are unable to make the date, for whatever reason, write up a letter giving NCIS a time frame on when the project can be completed. All the requests thus far have been very reasonable and have been approved. I know at the last two council meetings we wish a better explanation of the time frame had been included in the letters with more detail/instructions. In hindsight, that was an error on our part.

I think you can see there have been many improvements made as a result of this process around the city. What we are trying to do is work with people in a fair and organized manner. We want to ensure these areas are first addressed so that other issues like planning for businesses, developing updated and affordable housing, upgrading infrastructure, and building a city we can all be proud of in the years to come can be accomplished.

Respectfully,

Nathan McLaughlin
Mayor of Clarissa

Playing to your Strengths!!

"A Bucking Bull"
"Cowboy Church"
"The Red Letter Band"

Clarissa can build on our strengths. The rodeo is a great example of that in Todd County. It was a tremendous success that shows new ideas can provide opportunity... and fun for everyone!!!!!

Clarissa Rodeo turns out to be a huge success!!

INH: August 2007

The landscape at the Dean and Sandra Meiners' farm changed drastically this past weekend.What is typically a field on their farm just south of Clarissa quickly became transformed into a small city of rodeo contestants, their families and their beloved horses.

They clustered together to put on a show for area rodeo attendees as Clarissa hosted more than 160 high school rodeo contestants for the first time. The weather cooperated and the three day event was well attended by spectators from all around the area. If you didn't attend, you missed quite a show.

On Friday night they held a team roping competition. Two local cowboys decided to try their luck in the competition. Matt Dotzler and Brad Krupke, both of Clarissa, had never tried team roping before that evening. Before they hit the arena they said "it should be interesting". They had been practicing but said it would be quite different trying to rope a live animal. They seemed to enjoy the event even though they didn't have any luck roping the steer.

The rodeo contestants competed all day long in different events in the two arenas.At 5 p.m. both Saturday and Sunday The Red Letter Band held a concert before the rodeo performance and came back after Saturday's rodeo and played for another hour. The rodeo itself was a full fledged rodeo with barrel racing, pole bending, goat tying, team roping, break away roping, tie down roping, steer wrestling and the more dangerous events like bareback riding, saddle bronc and bull riding.

Alex Elliot, an eighteen-year-old bull rider from Elbow Lake, said, "I just love the adrenaline rush. It is something I can't explain. It is a great feeling every time I get on a bull. I attend Ashby High School and my football coach isn't too happy that I am still competing but I just love it."

Belene McLaughlin, of Clarissa, spent many hours organizing and promoting the rodeo. She said the event was "amazing, amazing, amazing. It was worth all the sweat and tears. I have been working on this since March. Without all the volunteers to make this happen, it would have been impossible."

Bull Rider Ian Fleace does his best to try and stay on for eight seconds.The following are comments from rodeo participants about Clarissa hosting the rodeo."I can't believe this happened in little Clarissa. Can we do it again next year?"

"Clarissa has rolled out the red carpet for us and it has been wonderful we have been to a lot bigger towns and don't get treated this well. We are honored.

"A rodeo mom said, "Clarissa has treated us with so much hospitality. You are the perfect host city and I hope you'll host it again next year. This is the best place we have ever rodeoed in. Thanks so much!"

One of the contestants said, "We wish you guys had Clarissa t-shirts for souvenirs. We all want one."

A rodeo dad said, "This has been unbelievable. I wish this was the last one of the season. It would be a great one to end with. It is one of the biggest shows we have done and we really are enjoying being here."

The Region 2 director said, "I hope we can put Clarissa on the map for next year."Riverside Meats was one of the food vendors for the rodeo. They felt that this is something all of Todd County can be a part of. They said they were smiling for three days.

Clarissa Mayor Nathan McLaughlin met with the regional directors and said it best. "We appreciated you all coming to Clarissa and we have enjoyed hosting the rodeo. These kids are definitely cut from a different cloth than myself. I am just glad I don't have to get on one of those animals."

The contestants and their families were very respectful and a pleasure to have in town.

Belene summed up the weekend in one sentence: "This was the most exciting weekend that I have had in many years, I am proud to be a part of a community that came together to make this happen" "Thanks so much to the Dean Meiners family, we could not have done this without you."

Absolute power (Scott Fischbach): corrupts absolutely (Scott Fischbach)

Republicans should have learned, one would think, after the last election drubbing that Republicans were to blame on many fronts both philosophical and financial.

Jack Abramoff was the financial cancer that killed the Republican majorities. The philosophical cancer is yet alive and well feeding on it’s all too willing hosts who reasoned themselves unreasonable.

I’m not sure if any powerful Republican would go up against MCCL Leadership or other similar organizations, because they appear to want the endorsement of a group that eats their own. A perverse kind of logic and reasoning that still have many wondering who will make The Grand Old Party live up to its name once again.

America’s Small City Mayor
__________________________________________________________________

Background on key GOP endorsement raises interesting facts
By Sid Salter
ssalter@clarionledger.com

State Sen. Charlie Ross of Brandon got some recent headlines and some political bragging rights out of a key endorsement in his Republican lieutenant governor's primary showdown with State Auditor Phil Bryant.

Ross got the endorsement of the Mississippi Right to Life organization, one of the state's major pro-life/anti-abortion groups. For conservative Republicans, it's a coveted endorsement - one that will show up in paid political advertising as a conservative bona fide.

To be sure, Mississippi Right to Life is a credible organization. Just as certain as that fact is that both Ross and Bryant are decidedly, unequivocally pro-life in their personal and political philosophies.

For that matter, so is Democratic contender state Rep. Jamie Franks of Mooreville. Mississippi
Right to Life has in prior elections endorsed Bryant, Franks and Ross.

Right to Life's Barbara Whitehead said: "All three candidates are pro-life. That will be on our Web site along with the information on all the other candidates that we sent questionnaires to. Jamie Franks and Charlie Ross both have pro-life voting records for these last four years. Phil Bryant did in the past when he was in the Legislature. All three of them have been endorsed by the PAC. This makes them all equal."

But Whitehead said that Ross got the endorsement because he was the "the best candidate for lieutenant governor from a right-to-life stand point."

Whitehead also confirmed that a key participant in selecting the slate of 396 Mississippi statewide and legislative candidates endorsed by the group and "the real backbone of our organization" is Scott Fischbach.

Whitehead said Fischbach is a member of the board of Mississippi Right to Life. Fischbach is also the leader of Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life and lives in Paynesville, Minn. He is the husband of Republican Minnesota state Sen. Michelle Fischbach of Paynesville, Minn.

In 2002, Campaigns and Elections Magazine named Fischbach a "rising star" in politics and in 2005 Minnesota Law and Politics dubbed Fischbach and his wife "king and queen of the red" in reference to their GOP influence.

Also in 2001-2002, Fischbach's political consulting firm, Coalition Productions, Inc., of Paynesville, Minn., received $22,000 in payments from the Ronnie Shows for Congress campaign in his Democratic congressional race against eventual winner Republican U.S. Rep. Chip Pickering.

Earlier this month, the Ross campaign reported $7,261 in total payments of Fischbach's Coalition Productions, Inc., firm. Ross said he hired Fischbach because "he's worked in the past for Haley Barbour, Amy Tuck, Kirk Fordice and a lot of other successful Republican candidates."
Ross said he was not aware that Fischbach was on the board of Mississippi Right to Life when he hired him prior to getting the group's endorsement.

"I hired him because he gets results and is effective," said Ross. "There was no quid pro quo."
Fischbach concurred in that assessment and said he did not participate in the choice of Ross for the endorsement but that after meeting Ross "I decided I wanted to go with him."

But a March 10, 2007, memo from Fischbach to Bryant paints a different picture. In that memo, which Fischbach confirmed, he said: "This race is going to be decided in the next 120 days and I want to do my part to ensure your victory." Bryant didn't hire him.

Fischbach said that despite his offer to Bryant, his hiring by Ross had nothing to do with Ross getting the endorsement.

"It's not like I said to Phil, hire me and you'll get the endorsement," said Fischbach. "I met with both of them. I liked Phil, he's pro-life, but I decided I wanted to go with Charlie. There was no quid pro quo, absolutely none."

Change: Ready or Not! (PART 1)

I am in the middle of my second term. I really wanted to use my first term to get to know the city, budgets, council, and citizens. I was quite new to this area, and I wanted to be respectful of the voters who put me in office by facilitating discussions on where we want to go. We took a lot of time to gather input and get a clear direction. I think it is paying off thus far.

A lot of things have changed this year in Clarissa. So much I'll do two parts on this subject. I have encouraged and worked for parts of it, and some came out of the blue so you have to deal with it.

• We passed Clarissa's first Comprehensive Plan. It is a lengthy document that myself, the council, and citizens of Clarissa built from the ground up over a year and a half. It is a plan for the next two decades and what our priorities are. I was so pleased to have it done because I'm a big believer in long term planning. I think any plan puts you on offence. In politics offence gives you an edge because you have more control over the agenda and where your going if you're following a plan that everyone agreed on.

• After the plan was passed the work begins. We purchased a dilapidated building downtown and have it slated for demolition this fall which will give a visual example to the skeptics that we are accomplishing something. This will be the first major change to our downtown in many years and I hope it will encourage others to become apart of our process.

• We also hired a building inspector to survey the city using the ordinances we have on our books. I expect a number of buildings within the city will be condemned and scheduled for removal. Clarissa is over 100 years old and the last major overhaul occurred just after WWII. This will be where fireworks will fly, and implementation of our plan gets more interesting because change often comes hard. Make sure you renew your subscription to the Independent News Herald so you don't miss out on the news.

• A change that caught our city by surprise was the closing of our manufacturing plant here in Clarissa. It's moving to Detroit, Michigan. It originated out of a Clarissa residents idea for a rock picking machine, and progressed into a company that has been a staple of Clarissa for decades. It's a loss of jobs, history, and some personal pride.

A SIDE NOTE: I've been in discussions with the company and State of Minnesota about the facility once the closing is complete. I am cautiously optimistic about filling the building with another business quite soon. We'll all know more soon.

It's been a busy year and I will elaborate more soon.

The Iran Connection

I recently made a trip over to Eastern Europe. I had a number of interesting things happen before I even landed in Moldova. My trip over included landing in Germany, and as my plane taxied we traveled past airlines from countries like Syria, Libya, and Iran. I thought how unique it was being out of the US, and what a truly unique culture airports have.

I had the opportunity to walk around the airport to stretch my legs. I decided to head up to McDonald's for one last Big Mac because my food selections would change shortly. Armed with my USA Today I sat down at a table overlooking the runway.

A gentleman about my age sat down at a table just across the isle. He glanced my way a few times before he asked: “Excuse me are you an American?” I said: “I was” and he introduced himself as an Iranian national from Tehran. He asked if I found any humor or saw the uniqueness in our meeting, which I certainly concurred.

We talked a lot about the perceived views in each country. The conversation was over many topics and was quick paced. He was not shy about talking politics or religious questions which I found interesting. A few of the interesting points he made:

• Citizens of Iran really don’t like the ruling class including their President. He believed that the current President will not be around much longer, and that the ruling class will eventually be overturned. He said the younger generations really consider themselves progressives, and want to enjoy a lot of the western freedoms. They are proud of the country and heritage.

• He also made the point to me he was Persian and not Arab. He went over some of their history and how they differentiate themselves from the rest of the Middle East.

• He was interested in my views on what Americans thought about the Iranian President and their people. (I told him that the inflammatory words combined with the intent to obtain nuclear capabilities are a major concern for us. We certainly don’t have any personal grudge with the everyday Iranian.)

• Lastly, he made a point that Muslims are superior in their religion because they are faithful and commanded to pray five times a day. I told him my Bible commands us to pray without ceasing and gave him the verse he could look up. The look on his face was that of being perplexed as I don’t think he’d heard that reply before.
  

As quick as it started it was over.

The Thompson Tease

I watched the GOP Debates last night and was pretty impressed with Governor Romney. In fact he was the clear winner on style and presentation. Unfortunately for Romney the term "flip-flopper" was coined by Republican operatives who know how to use the word and pin it on you if they want.

He will get hammered when it comes to his campaign comments on abortion, universal health care, and the like. I guess conservatives just get skeptical of anyone from Massachusetts, and we'll see if presentation can rule the day. Romney certainly hasn't had a problem raising cash. Cash is king in politics so he is a player in this race for sure.

At this point I think conservatives have more respect for Giuliani than Romney. He has at least remained true to his core beliefs though many will not agree. If he's going to remain pro-choice, however, he needs to come up with a more concise response if he has any chance.

He is probably the first presidential candidate the libertarian wing of the party can get excited about. I have much sympathy and respect for the libertarians, so we'll see if they show up in the caucuses that have normally been the social conservative domain.

McCain I think ended the debate strong and he should start moving into the front position as we see Rudy start to fade. It was a good night for McCain overall.

The other clear winner last night I think was Senator Fred Thompson who hasn't declared and wasn't there. I think his strategy of continuing to build suspense is working very well and the other campaigns will have to address it. I've not heard any of the campaigns addressing "The Thompson Tease" and they run the risk of being overwhelmed.

The lack of Newt or mention of his name was also noticeable.

Friday, May 4, 2007

(05-04) 16:26 PDT Newport Beach (Orange County) -- Millions of Americans know him as "Law & Order's" take-charge District Attorney Arthur Branch, and he's played statesman-like characters ranging from the CIA director to General Ulysses S. Grant, but is actor Fred
Thompson really auditioning to become president of the United States?

That is the political drama unfolding the day after 10 Republican presidential hopefuls held their first televised debate and as Thompson, 65, a former Tennessee senator, prepared to address an audience of 400 at the Lincoln Club of Orange County.

With eight months until the first 2008 presidential primaries and caucuses, and an already-packed field of GOP presidential hopefuls, Thompson's entry into the campaign would dramatically reshape the race. Polls show that Thompson -- although not yet a candidate -- already places third behind Arizona Sen. John McCain and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

The polls are evidence, some Republicans say, of just how many of the party's faithful voters are hungry for new choices.

"He may have been the real winner of (Thursday's) GOP debate,'' said Pete Snyder, CEO of Washington D.C.-based New Media Strategies. Snyder said the advance buzz regarding Thompson's Friday night appearance in Orange County was something other Republican candidates would love to have.

Still, some GOP insiders are reluctant to even talk about Thompson because he is stealing attention from the declared Republican candidates.

"He's not a candidate,'' California state Republican Party Chairman Ron Nehring said when asked about Thompson this week. "It's like trying to comment on what the weather is going to be in another month.''

The actor and conservative politician's voice and strong demeanor have drawn comparisons to the late President Ronald Reagan. Conservatives particularly seem to be drawn to Thompson for his record on social issues, such as his opposition to abortion and gun control, and his background as a former federal prosecutor.

Thompson, who retired from the Senate after eight years in 2002, has fueled intense speculation about his political future with his appearance at the influential Lincoln Club timed for one day after the nationally television debate. Many see Thompson's speech as a dry run for a presidential announcement that could come as early as June.

Rival political campaigns are watching Thompson's moves closely.

McCain, one of the leading GOP contenders, said this week that he believes Thompson, a friend and former colleague, will run for the GOP nomination. One McCain strategist said polls show Thompson could shave 1 or 2 percentage points from the Arizona senator, but is likely to steal more supporters from former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, another candidate who is depicting himself as a standard bearer for conservatives.

Despite Snyder's point of view, other Republican consultants think the debate at the Reagan presidential library in Simi Valley introduced many of the current candidates to the country for the first time and may have probably stole some of Thompson's thunder.

"Fred might see that after the debate, a little of the vacuum has been filled,' said veteran GOP strategist Mike Murphy said.

With McCain delivering a strong performance, Giuliani weighing in on terrorism, and Romney perceived as giving a winning effort, "the voltage has been turned down a bit" for Thompson, and "a little of his sizzle has been de-sizzled,'' Murphy said.

Now that Republicans have heard from their candidates on issues such as abortion, the Iraq war and the Reagan legacy, they may not be as interested in a Republican who hasn't yet committed to the contest, he said.

Many Republican at the debate openly wondered how Thompson will be able to catch up in fund-raising and organization with his competitors. He is rumored to be looking for campaign operatives and has suggested he will be able to launch a strong Internet campaign effort in early primary states like Iowa and New Hampshire.

Still, some Republican insiders say the actor-candidate deserves watching -- because his background and his political skills are so different from the rest of the pack, all traditional candidates who have spent most of their adult lives in politics.

"Thompson is none of the above,'' says Hoover Institution fellow Bill Whalen. "I hear a lot of people buzz about him and talk about him in Reaganesque terms. He's telegenic, he has a presidential presence and (people) like the sound of his voice and his Southern accent,'' he said.

"But what's missing from the equation is the beliefs.''

"I have no idea what he'll be running on,'' Whalen said, "other than the fact that he's not Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney and John McCain.''

Already, Thompson appears keenly aware of the pitfalls the GOP front runners have faced: subjected to far more criticism, scrutiny and political backstabbing that is likely to erode poll numbers as the campaign continues.

His strategy appears to be to keep the drama -- will he or won' he? -- running as long as possible.

In today's tough political arena, "the best way to run for president these days is not to run for president," Whalen said. "The moment you announce, you drop. And a lot of candidates have learned that the hard way.''


San Francisco Chronicle
Is Thompson entering the presidential race?
Carla Marinucci, Chronicle Political Writer
Friday, May 4, 2007

UN-FAIR FUNDING IN EDUCATION

The Education bill has been passed out of the MN House.

It has always been a mystery why party line (Republican vs. Democrat) plays such an important role on education funding. A rural Representative of either party should be fighting for their district to ensure a child in Eagle Bend has the same education as the one in Edina. The fact that rural Representatives of either party voted for this bill is disappointing.

I believe Representative Otremba voted for this bill, and basically it gives lots of money to metro school and less money to schools that are not metro. The fight in St. Paul on issues like this should involve the Representatives of the out-metro schools banding together regardless of party to see fairness in education funding.

A break down of what school districts will get per pupil:


Minneapolis: 12,804
LP-GE: 8,750
Browerville: 8,171
Eagle Valley: 9,459
Bertha Hewitt: 9,090
Alexandria: 8,403


There were several amendments offered to equalize the funding between metro and rural, but those failed on a largely partisan basis.

Pawlenty VS Minnesota Democrats

When Trains Collide
Pawlenty VS Minnesota Democrats

Minnesota House Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher said they would focus on the issues of property taxes, education, and health care “like a laser beam.” However, I wonder if the average Minnesotan feels more like a deer in the headlights of a train barreling down the tracks.

There are about six weeks left in the 2007 legislative session. Personally I have my bets on yet another special session. The bills heading to the Governor are set for a veto. The bills with tax increases have little chance of an override with the exception of a watered down gas tax according to my sources in St. Paul.

I am still surprised Democrats are reaching the way they have in their first year. I think it’s been a disastrous public relations nightmare. I’ve personally given up trying to keep track of the hundreds of millions of dollars in new tax increases on top of the huge state surplus. Even Steve Sviggum, who everyone thought would leave after the last election cycle, seems to have found his stride.

In Clarissa from The Mayor’s perspective Democrats are bent on gutting JOBZ, implementing smoking bans on private property, and really providing no real property tax reform except for income redistribution schemes. Rep. Mary Ellen Otremba has really been put on the hot seat in this area. She is trying to talk the party line right now, or at least trying to put a bow on it. One old Democrat here told me “St. Paul liberals are about to shoot the old Blue Dogs back behind the shed at this rate.”

A couple observations:

First, the Governor is in the better bio-diesel train at this point. Anyone who is being honest would rather argue the position of keeping taxes low and spending in the 9 percent range.

Second, the Governor isn’t defending the slight Republican majority this time so he is not needing the deal. I hope Democrats know four years is an eternity in politics and they have more to lose in this session.

Our Tim Pawlenty Conundrum

Our Tim Pawlenty Conundrum
Horses, Wagons, and Political Trails

Conundrum is the perfect word when talking about our likable and popular Minnesota Governor. It is especially true as it relates to the political trail he has opted for onto the national scene. For those keeping score:

Conundrum is defined as either:

A: a question or problem having only a conjectural answer

B: an intricate and difficult problem

Conundrum is even more appropriate when talking about Pawlenty’s quick alignment with the John McCain 2008 Presidential Campaign. He has, as the subtitle suggests, hitched his horse to the McCain wagon. The quick decision has left many political junkies here in Minnesota scratching their heads when we look at the risk & reward for our Governor.

I should mention here:

• I’ve met the Governor and have watched his politics as Legislator & Governor. I honestly believe he is the best thing to happen to Minnesota politics in a long….long….time. He’s taken a lot of grief from conservatives and democrats on varying issues. Yet, he has remained true and shown leadership in what has been the most trying economic period in a long time.

• His record nationally will leave future party opponents scratching the bottom of the barrel looking for any “liberal” leanings. Issues like taxes, education, guns, abortion, and conservative family credentials are all there.
  

Pawlenty, by all accounts, is one of the remaining national Republicans that can point to true political strength and prowess in a BLUE state. In Minnesota all Constitutional offices, our Minnesota House and Senate ended up or stayed in Democratic control. Pawlenty was the lone exception to that rule who squeaked by. I would like to mention that in a normal political environment Pawlenty would’ve wiped the floor with Attorney General Mike Hatch.

Pawlenty is calculating and smart. His quick alignment accompanied by the “stock” reasoning has left the rest of us to contemplate the Pawlenty conundrum. Here are the three answers I have come up with. None fit well if you are a political observer of Pawlenty politics here in Minnesota. I’d love to hear your thoughts.

1. Pawlenty thinks McCain and the Republicans may or may not win in 2008 given the war and recent Republican defeats. A McCain alliance gets Pawlenty a dry run at the Republican primary nationally with face time, political connections, and fundraising links.
   
   
2. Pawlenty flew over to Iraq with McCain a few months ago. On that flight there were suggestions and offers of possible positions (wink....wink…nod….nod) at the cabinet or vice-presidential level. I don’t think if McCain wins the nomination Pawlenty is the right vice-presidential fit. He’s not a well known national conservative, so McCain will need someone to rally the base. Senator Fred Thompson or The Newt would fit that bill better.
   
   
3. Pawlenty, as he said, thinks McCain is the right guy to lead the country and wants to continue to be the Governor of Minnesota with no national ambitions at all.
   

As a fan of Pawlenty I worry about the quick alignment so soon when other leaders have waited. McCain’s more libertarian social views, contentious relationship with conservatives, and his view on the war are all risks that could hurt Pawlenty in the future when it didn't have to be. I hope the rewards far out way those risks and I’d love for the Governor to explain his reasoning behind the decision someday. We wish him the best.

The Colbert Report: He's Joking.....She's not!!!

A Note to Minnesota Democrats: It's the war.....Stupid!!

A Note to Minnesota Democrats:
It’s the war…..stupid!

I remember the past election well. I think Republicans knew it wasn’t going to be a good year. However, I think Republicans were all shocked by the dramatic political shift in one night. All the pundits and polling said it was overwhelmingly attributed to the war in Iraq.

If you had an (R) by your name the citizenry threw you out. In Minnesota it was no different with the exception of our affable Governor Tim Pawlenty. Most people I talked with said they went right down the ballot on a straight Democratic Party vote. Honestly they didn’t know much about the Republicans they voted against, however; they just wanted some checks and balances on the direction of the war.

So last night………………..

I was watching Almanac at the Capital. It felt as if I was watching clips of Walter Mondale give his “I’m going to raise your taxes” speech. Remember? It’s the only part of Mondale’s 1984 Campaign you remember twenty-something years later. To tell you how memorable it was for me I would point out I was nine years old. He looked right into the lens and after he said it you could hear the collective silence across America as people thought: “He said what!”

It’s obvious to me the Democrats need a lesson in public relations and quick. Luckily America’s Small City Mayor is here to help……no extra charge.

Honestly, I felt that if Democrats played their cards right they could easily hold onto power for a decade minimum. Maybe longer if they tried hard and were really, really good. I watched last night and literally felt bad for their supporters. The TV spots last night gave enough campaign commercial material to last Republicans for years.

There was one legislator who went on and on about how he was going to take your money for education, take your money for transportation. I kept waiting for the Speaker of the House to run down the isle and tackle him to shut him up. It wasn’t one spot either. It literally sounded as if Mary Lahammer couldn’t believe what she was hearing. It sounded like they could’ve played different sound-bites all night.

Democrats have a problem because what they say and what they mean are two different things. I remember them saying here in Clarissa: "we’re going to make investments in education, transportation, etc." That is okay to say because it sounds good. It makes you look as if you’re concerned and care about those specific issues. It also covers up what you actually mean which is: “I’m going to raise your taxes to fund education”

So two pointers I’ll give you tax & fee free Minnesota Democrats:

• First, the election was about the war. You are trying to spin the election into an agenda and areas of policy that never existed. Minnesota voters are smart and you won’t fool them. Keep it up and you risk the House of Representatives for sure.

• Second, please pay attention to when you’re talking. What went on last night was that Democrats went around saying what they mean, and not saying what they should say. That is a big difference! I understand when you have to differentiate so often it can get confusing so............keep your heads up and best of luck next time.

Open Letter to MCCL: Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life

Open Letter to MCCL
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life

I released a Letter to the Editor during the last election cycle. (Posted Below)

I am wondering what the status is of all the pro-life legislation in the Minnesota Legislature?

I think Mr. LaLonde and Mr. Fischbach should elaborate on all of their successes this legislative session on behalf of the unborn.

Note to those not involved in-depth in politics:

• MCCL is the untouchable and revered organization in "conservative" Minnesota politics that has really gone unquestioned. Recently MCCL has demonstrated questionable leadership and also authored dangerous legislation in my view.
  
  Original legislation like: providing pain medication for children before they are aborted. I received an email from the two leaders saying I just didn’t understand what they were trying to do. They were trying to show that babies can feel pain in the womb. My reply below was:

So we’re going to show babies have pain by inflicting pain on them…..brilliant MCCL!! I understand since then this bill has modified becasue their appear to be others who also didn't see the brilliance of the original bill.

I renew my call: Mr. LaLonde and Mr. Fischbach should step down.
_____________________________________________________

MCCL President LaLonde and Executive Director Fischbach should step down!

To the editor:

• I found MCCL President LaLonde’s editorial in the Alexandria ECHO press a few months ago to be upsetting as someone who is concerned about the number of abortions that occur here in the State of Minnesota. Now published in the Independent News Herald in Todd County we have Scott Fischbach, MCCL Executive Director, viciously attacking pro-life candidate Austin Bleess. This is two separate attacks by MCCL on a pro-life candidate.
  
• Together their editorials show me gross incompetence and a true lack of strong leadership at the top of MCCL. It is making me reconsider my support of the organization, but not the cause itself. I was under the impression that you stood solely for the pro-life agenda, and all other political agendas were irrelevant.
  
• In our district house race we have a pro-life Democrat - Mary Ellen Otremba running against a pro-life Republican - Austin Bleess. So, instead of MCCL spending time, energy, and resources trying to defeat pro-abortion candidates around the state, you have your Executive Director Scott Fischbach; write a letter to the editor in my local newspaper attacking the pro-life Bleess.
  
• That's just great, now we have a supposedly pro-life organization attacking a pro-life candidate. This must leave the pro-abortion folks in pure joy. If the pro-life agenda was the only agenda you had in mind, then obviously you don't have a dog in this fight. What exactly is your point here?
  
• In my opinion, if you have two pro-life candidates running against each other, you should keep your nose out of it, and use your time, energy, and effort in defeating pro-abortion candidates, which I thought was the sole reason you existed? I am extremely disappointed in MCCL. I am sad to say that at this time I really have to consider discontinuing my support of MCCL, and will seek out another pro-life organization that doesn't seem to have a hidden political agenda.
  
• I wonder if Mr. LaLonde and Mr. Fischbach are looking forward to all the legislation they will get passed should we be looking at a Speaker Entenza, or a similar protégé? Do they know why the Health and Human Services bill failed in the Minnesota State Senate and did not come to a floor vote? It was because there was fear that pro-life legislation would be added to the bill, so it was aborted.
  
• For Mr. LaLonde and Mr. Fischbach to say that Mary Ellen Otremba is courageous by not voting to me is incredible! If courage is showed by doing nothing we have a problem and it starts with the leadership of MCCL.
  
• The representation by Mr. LaLonde and Mr. Fischbach does not show strong leadership and it is time they should step down.

___________________________________________________

1/27/2005: Personal Email:

Dear MCCL & Representative Otremba:

I have always been a supporter of MCCL, and think all of you do a great job of influencing policies here in Minnesota on behalf of all unborn children. I have also been appreciative of Representative Otremba’s support of life and realize she takes a stand unpopular within her party.

I was confused by an article in the Independent News Herald (Clarissa) regarding “painless abortions”. It referenced Rep. Mary Ellen Otremba and MCCL both supporting this position. It stated that MCCL and Rep. Otremba are authoring/supporting a bill to give mothers the option of administering pain medication to unborn children before they are aborted. I understand the concept of reducing human suffering, but feel this position is extremely misguided and potentially sends a wrong message.

If we want to end the suffering of children in the womb the end of the practice of abortion is the ultimate goal. I understand there are legislative practices that aid in bringing this about over time through incremental steps, yet I am missing how this specific bill aids in that process. Again the article basically states we are supporting a bill that would enable the mother to have the option of making the suffering of their child less while being aborted.

I would like a more detailed explanation behind the support of this bill and how it fits into the overall strategy of MCCL. I think the press release as written will cause much confusion and disappointment among many of your supporters and hope both of you will clarify the position being taken here.


Sincerely,

Nathan P. McLaughlin
Mayor of Clarissa

Rudy, Rudy, Rudy Giuliani

Uninspired & The 2008 Presidential Elections

Rudy, Rudy, Rudy Giuliani
(Part II)

Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani entered the 2008 Presidential Campaign on February 5th by stating: “I’m in this to win.” It appears if the election was held today from the latest polls he’d be leading the pack with what appears to be a great opportunity.

Rudy certainly has proven his courage as we watched the video footage of him running towards the Twin Towers that had yet to fall. I believe Rudy understands better than any leader the threat that this new brand of terrorism poses to a country like the United States.

Rudy is a great public speaker and has a very likable personality. His past stints on Saturday Night Live show he understands how the political game is played. Rudy can certainly inspire a crowd, and is a sought after speech maker telling of the heroic and courageous actions that were required on September 11th.

I will not spend a lot of time on the Giuliani Campaign and in the words of FDR I will: “Be sincere, be brief, and be seated.”

The world of Presidential politics fully vets each candidate. I remember the pre-September 11th Rudy, and so does everyone else. The Rudy that as Marc Humbert of ABC News writes on March 10th:

“In fact, Giuliani's support for abortion and gay rights, his backing of gun control measures and his very New Yorkness already had given conservatives pause about his candidacy. He has also marched in gay pride parades, dressed up in drag and lived temporarily with a gay couple and their Shih Tzu.“

And……Checkmate…..Rudy has to know the gay pride photos with him in drag are out there. I’m sure there are a few stories the gay couple can be persuaded to share as well. Photos speak louder than words, and to Conservatives "loud words" mean something.

Now where’s my chair so I can sit down.

Uninspired & The 2008 Presidential Elections (John McCain)

Uninspired & The 2008 Presidential Elections
John McCain (Part 1)

It’s been a while since I’ve envied the Democratic Party…..a long while.

The news, in conservative and mainstream arenas, are filled with articles, interviews, and polls focusing on Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and yes…….that Oscar attending, Nobel Prize nominated super star: Al Gore. It is a political story with big personalities and bigger story lines. Yes I admit it…… I’m jealous, and lots of Republicans I know are too.

So what is wrong with the Republicans? Oh let me count the ways. (Part 1)

FLASHBACK: Dole for President 1996:

Bob Dole was a Republican, distinguished war hero, skilled senior U.S. Senator, and ultimate Washington insider who ran for President in 1996. I mention this, not to insult your intelligence, but because it is highly possible you missed it even if you were paying attention. I know…..I know…..it is surprising given the passion Bob Dole inspired from the true Republican Party faithful and conservatives from around the nation. How he lost we may never know.

FLASHFORWARD: so enters a Republican, distinguished war hero, skilled senior U.S. Senator, and ultimate Washington insider who is running for President in 2008. The last time I saw him was on CNBC’s Hardball, where he was succinctly stating his position on the hot button issue of same-sex marriage.

I thought John…here is your chance…..could you at least try and inspire the people who want to knock on doors and have a winning campaign. Well, after a few false starts and the commercial break he finally clarified his position one more time, and asked his handler if “that was better”.

Surprised….No!! Wishing for good old days of 1996 Presidential Politics……YES!!!

McCain’s problem is bigger and much, much, much worse. First, Republicans and Conservatives who haven’t met him or know him personally don’t like him, nor do we exactly trust his new found conservatism. Also, Senator Dole didn’t run around the country making it a point to bash social and religious conservative’s year in and year out when he wasn’t running for President. Dole didn’t pass the Incumbent Protection Act which killed much of the grass roots political party units, and ensured only the wealthy or connected could compete in elections.

• Note: Elephants have good memories.
  

The Coming Smoking Ban in Minnesota:

The Coming Smoking Ban in Minnesota:
How we just changed the definition of “public” to include your

“private property”.

I should start off by saying I don’t smoke………….never have. I encourage my kids not to use tobacco products. I’m aware of all of the science and health related facts. In fact, most people who smoke…. I believe….would encourage people not to start.

Enter our Democratic Legislature and our Governor. God bless them so concerned about our CHILDREN and our HEALTH. Who in the name of apple pie and the flag are going to tell law abiding citizens and business owners what they can and cannot do in private establishments.

I’m a big believer in free markets and individual freedoms. If our politicians don't want to have their health endangered or smell like smoke when in a "private" business I'd encourage them to use our good old fashioned free market here in Minnesota. Instead they have decided to take away the space once owned by private individuals on their property and claim it for the state because politicians know best.

I choose to patron restaurants that control the smoking areas, or choose to not have smoking in their establishment. I guess in St. Paul politicians would rather legislate their viewpoint by redefining the word "public" to include the Mom & Pop "private" restaurants, bars, and other establishments all over the state?

I'm not sure which is more dangerous now: the redefining of the word "public" to include our "private" property or smoke.

A new business owner is required to invest 20% of their personal assets in a new venture. That business owner will devote 40 to 60 hours per week working to see their dream come true. All the while hiring employees, buying products and services, and generating economic activity in their area.

This new law is about as “self-serving politician knows best” a solution that has come down the pike in a while. The entrepreneur is the life-blood of a rural economy here in central Minnesota. As the Mayor of Clarissa I’m concerned about the new entrepreneurs, and I hope citizens will call St. Paul and let their legislature know.

P.S………….If the politicians are truly concerned with our health then they should have the political will to ban this killer. Why won’t they ban a killer?

Follow the money……..it generates a TON of money from lawsuits and taxes.

If anyone should be ashamed for blowing smoke our Governor, State Representatives, and Senators should take a good look in the mirror.

Are Our Small Rural Towns Functionally Dead?

Are Our Small Rural Towns Functionally Dead?

Jack M. Geller

• A few years ago I found myself making a presentation to a group of rural and agricultural leaders when I was asked a question about a much thought of, but seldom mentioned topic. After citing the history of a specific small town of approximately 200 residents, with the loss of most of its main street businesses, closure of the local school and loss of the local grain elevator, he stated his question by concluding, “Let’s face it, this town is dead! But is anyone going to ever say it out loud?”
• 
  Putting the dramatic effect aside, with well over 350 of Minnesota’s more than 853 incorporated cities and towns having 500 or fewer residents, it’s a question we should really spend much more time discussing. After all, more than 80,000 Minnesotans live in such places. And it’s true — many of these small rural communities have dramatically changed over the past 40-50 years, with significant losses to main street businesses, loss of job-producing industries, closure and consolidation of local schools and significant population losses. But are these small communities functionally dead as the questioner believed? Well, from my perspective the answer lies with your definition of community.

• Clearly, if you define “community” as a place with a somewhat autonomous micro-economy and evaluate its vitality based upon job-creation, sales tax receipts and population growth, then yes, many of these small towns are functionally dead. But I prefer a different definition and evaluation of community. I prefer the definition proposed by State Economist Tom Stinson and State Demographer Tom Gillaspy in the winter 2006 issue of the Rural Minnesota Journal. Essentially, Stinson and Gillaspy view such small towns not as micro-economic units, but rather as spatially separated neighborhoods. And when you think about it, viewing our small rural communities as neighborhoods makes an enormous amount of sense. After all, what is a neighborhood other than a cluster of residences where people live, build social networks and collectively define their quality of life.

• Yes, it is true that there are only a few jobs or commercial enterprises there, and most of the workforce residing in these rural “neighborhoods” rises each morning only to drive to work in some other nearby or sometimes distant community. But so what? Isn’t that equally true for many residents in metro-area neighborhoods as well? Have you ever watched the commuting patterns throughout the metro each morning? The important point is that each evening residents return to their respective neighborhoods (both rural and urban), because that’s where they choose to live, raise their families and feel connected to fellow residents in their neighborhood.

• Accepting small rural communities as residentially oriented neighborhoods rather than economically oriented entities has significant implications for rural development efforts as well. Just think of all the resources expended in efforts trying to breathe life back into the local economy of these small rural places: whether it is developing industrial parks, business recruitment, or other economic development efforts, we have to admit that in most instances the results are seldom worth the effort. But by accepting these small rural places as neighborhoods, we can shift our focus from economic development to community development, where improving the quality of life for its residents is the goal. This may mean holding community conversations about parks, community arts and theater, the needs of local youth and senior citizens, and determining what activities are most important to meet the needs of local residents.

• Finally, viewing your small rural community as a residentially oriented neighborhood allows you to no longer view neighboring communities and regional centers as economic competitors. So when a neighboring community acquires a new restaurant, movie theater or industry, you can view it as another regional amenity or employment opportunity that improves the quality of life for residents in your neighborhood, rather than viewing such occurrences as the business that should have located in our town!

• So in the end my answer to the questioner was rather simple and straightforward. No, I do not believe that many of these small rural towns are dead or destined to die. Rather, I believe that the ultimate fate of these towns will depend less and less on their local efforts to revive the local economy and more and more on their efforts to build a collective quality of life that connects local residents to place. Simply put, communities that successfully create a quality of life that connects residents and establishes a collective sense of place will ultimately help ensure that others will find their “neighborhood” as attractive as they do.

(Jack M. Geller: president of the St. Peter-based Center for Rural Policy & Development. He can be reached at jgeller@ruralmn.org.)